Saturday, 7 April 2012

Change in mindset of policymakers must to ensure safety of journalists

Karachi, Journalists working in conflict areas face enormous challenges and threats and there is a dire need to change the mindsets of policymakers in media organizations to ensure safety and security of journalists.
This was said by participants of a roundtable discussion on  Reporting Conflict  held at Hotel Avari Towers in Karachi on April 6, 2012, which was organized by Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF).
Senior electronic media professionals including news directors, bureau chiefs, reporters and representatives of civil society organizations across from all four provinces and tribal areas/FATA participated in the discussion.
They said that reporting in conflict areas is a difficult task, and it needs proper training so as to ensure responsible and impartial reporting, keeping personal security in view. It was also observed that most of the time desk staff does not understand the ground realities in some cases, which also put journalist in danger.
The participants said that an effective campaign should be run to discourage  Lifafa Journalism,  which they said had turned into  Easy Paisa or Card Loading journalism.  They said that one cannot imagine ideal conditions for reporting in Pakistan, adding that there is lack of trainings and self accountability, which hinder responsible journalism.
General Secretary, Pakistan Press Foundation, Owais Aslam Ali said that life of journalists has become very difficult and one third of journalists working in tribal areas or conflict zone have already left their homes and shifted to other places to save their lives.
On the occasion, Vice chairman of HECP Tahir Hassan Khan, Shahzada Zulfiqar from Quetta, Faisal Aziz Khan of Geo News, , Ali Shinvari from FATA, Trainer Saeed Minhas, Rabiah Baig of Internews, Sadaf Baig of Intermedia,  Imtiaz Chandio of Waqt News TV, Riazul Haq of CAMP , Wahid Jaskani of KTN News, Aamir Ahmad, and others also shared their views.

Whatever I do, my mother did first: Barkha Dutt

by Barkha Dutt
Editor’s Note: Before there was Barkha Dutt, there was her mother pioneering journalist Prabha Dutt. Barka writes that though the media called her the “first woman war correspondent” after Kargil, that honour belongs to her mother as well. Both Chameli Devi Jain Award winners for Outstanding Woman Mediapersons, Barkha tells the story of her mother and why even now yeh dil maange more. Extracted from  Making News, Breaking News, Her Own Way, ed. by Latika Padgaonkar and  Shubha Singh, published by Tranquebar Press, an imprint of Westland Ltd.,  2012.
WIkimedia Commons
News was as intrinsic to our formative years as the mandatory daily portion of green vegetables or the evening reward of milk and cookies. As a child of five I remember being asked to identify obscure world leaders from the covers of Time magazine to brush up my general knowledge. Much before I was a journalist, I was a journalist’s daughter and grew up, shaped and formed by early exposure to the adrenalin rush of news and the satisfaction that comes from making a difference.
Looking back at my sixteen years in the news business, it seems that everything I do today, my mother had done decades ago. Though she died from a sudden brain haemorrhage in 1984, when I was just thirteen, Prabha Dutt’s accomplishments and outspoken convictions would be the abiding influence of my life.
In 1999, when I won the Chameli Devi Jain Award for my reporting on the Orissa cyclone and the Kargil war, it was my most cherished recognition because my mother had won the same award almost three decades earlier in 1982. In many ways, the battles that women of my mother’s generation waged to make their mark in a deeply misogynistic industry smashed the glass ceiling and made it possible for me and my contemporaries to do what we do today.
Though dubbed the country’s ‘first woman war correspondent’ for my frontline reporting of the Kargil conflic between India and Pakistan, that distinction was not mine. As a child I would listen goggle-eyed to the story of how my mother made it to the war front.

It was 1965. Prabha Dutt, at this time still single and a young woman in her twenties, had already had to fight to convince newspaper editors that women journalists were good for more than reporting on the local flower show in town. (Yes, this is actually the role an editor offered her when she first interviewed for a job). When war broke out between India and Pakistan, she was audacious enough to demand that she be assigned to cover the conflict. The response, not surprisingly, was a categorical ‘No’. Not used to taking ‘no’ for an answer, especially when it came to her work, my mother rather smartly asked for some days off instead, supposedly to visit her parents in Punjab.
Vacation sanctioned, she made her way all by herself to Khem-Karan, and started sending back dispatches from the front that the Hindustan Times found too good to not publish.
My defining memory of my mother comes from an iconic photograph of her perched atop a tank, army cap flung casually on her head, utterly oblivious of the curious stares of the soldiers behind her, wearing a huge smile that clearly marks the satisfaction that can only come from a good story.
In 1999, desperate to be able to report from the battle-zone of Kargil, I had to first tackle multiple gender hurdles with a sceptical Army which believed this was no job for a woman. Finally, after assuring them that a quick duck under a tree or behind a stone was a happy substitute for a loo and that I sought absolutely no preferential protection, I was able to report on what would come to be known as the country’s first televised war.
Ironically, this was still before technology had transformed the television industry. There were no portable satellite uplinks available to us in an era when mobile phones were not operational across Jammu and Kashmir. Getting our reports from the frontline on air was almost as tough as reporting on the war itself. We would most often ferry tapes back on the helicopters deployed to fly injured soldiers home, sometimes walking or driving for miles just to find one. At other times, a bulky satellite phone was the only mode of communication that connected us to the outside world for days on end, and that too when we were able to get a signal on it. Kargil, and the early exposure to near-death situations, transformed me in ways that took me years to understand. It also challenged my simplistic assumptions about soldiers and courage. I spent time with the young men – boys-who-wouldbe-men, really – and I understood how valour and vulnerability could co-exist in complex, but searingly real ways. It was humanising their stories that became the mainstay of my reporting.
The first major interview I did with Captain Vikram Batra would also become the first obituary I would write from the frontline. He was the swashbuckler, the bright-eyed, josheela soldier who led from the front. His comment in my interview, ‘Yeh Dil Maange More’, to describe his readiness to go forward for the next assault, would soon become a national motto.
Ten years after the war, I travelled with his twin brother, Vishal, back to the frontline. We sat under a clear blue sky and gazed at the mountain peak now named after Vikram as a tribute to his courage in helping India reclaim it from Pakistani intruders. We felt we could hear him speak to us. Perhaps the most heart-wrenching image was of Vishal reading aloud a letter he had written to his twin ten years ago, his voice resounding in the stillness of the mountains, a tearful, but proud salute marking his final farewell.
After the war, people asked how I tackled the fear. The truth is that there was no time to process it. One just kept pace with the breathless turn of events, lying flat on the roadbehind the giant shield of an army truck tyre, trying to speak over the thunder of artillery pounding Tiger Hill, spending more than a night in the car or behind a rock when the car got shelled. All this left no time to take cognizance of the risks. The acute awareness of being a woman and the determined resolve that none should call me ‘fragile’ or ‘weak’ made me self-conscious even in overwhelmingly tense situations.
I remember a long night spent huddled in an underground bunker with soldiers who were to go up for an assault the next morning. These men had just saved our lives, lunging to push us away from an ammunition dump targeted by Pakistani shelling and then offering us their bunker to keep us safe. We sat around a decrepit tape recorder listening to Kenny Rogers’ country music, trying our best to stay calm. In the accelerated intimacy that can only be created by situations where the lines blur between life and death, we felt instantly sentimental about these young soldiers. But, when the moment came to say goodbye and good-luck to them, my male colleagues cried openly, as I buried my face in my shirtsleeves and fought back the tears, resolved that none should ever throw my gender in my face once the war was over.
Navigating the complex issues of gender equality is something I learnt from my mother. Even before I understood what journalism was all about, I remember her storming intomy school demanding to know how and why I had been stopped from pursuing a woodcraft class on the basis of being a girl. The course, which required use of heavy saws and hammers, was absurdly open only to the boys. My mother would have none of it. Her spunk was legendary. As was her insistence on perfection and her contempt for mediocrity. As a person she was a deeply loyal friend, a yaaron ka yaar, but as a professional she was entirely willing to be unpopular, sometimes at great risk to herself, to me and my younger sister. As children, we remember hushed conversations around the dining table about one or the other threat from theprotagonists of her investigative reports. My father, an Air India official, spent several years posted away from India. So often, it was just the three of us in the house. I have vivid memories of stalkers lurking about in the lane outside, mysterious callers who would hang up after calling, and serious attempts at physical intimidation. None of it could quell Prabha Dutt. Whether it was scooping a story on the use of beef tallow in shudh vanaspati, or busting a medical scam at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, she had an irrepressible conviction. When the jail authorities denied her permission to interview Billa and Ranga, the notorious murderers who had been handed a death sentence for kidnapping and killing two school children, Geeta and Sanjay Chopra, she went to court against the decision. Not surprisingly she got her interview just before the two men were executed. And Prabha Dutt vs Union of India entered the annals of case law. Many years later, in pursuit of a similar interview, I would use it as legal precedent. However, I did not have her luck or, perhaps, her single-minded focus.
Though my mother died when I was very young, there is one thing I learnt from her early on. In life, you can only be true to yourself. The rest be damned. As I evolved into a journalist reporting on different issues, I found that some viewers and readers had a propensity to box you in with labels. My reporting on different conflict zones across the world has involved years spent reporting from Jammu and Kashmir. It is a state where, to borrow from Akira Kurosawa, there are at least seven shades of truth, if not more. The sacrifices of the military, of which I am a huge admirer, have co-existed with unforgivable human rights violations of which I am an outspoken critic.
The gains made by two transparent Assembly elections and a recently concluded panchayat election, have co-existed with a genuine sense of alienation in the Kashmir Valley. The shameful exodus of the Pandits is as much a truth of the state as are the many injustices heaped on its people whenever justice is subverted. Every time I have tried to reflect one orthe other nuance of this complex issue, I find the other side pouncing on me in anger. So, for the same series of reports, I have often been branded both ‘agent of the state’ and ‘antinational’. It is from my mother that I learnt to disregard dogmas and labels ascribed to you by others and carry on with whatever you believe in. It is also from her that I learnt that nothing can substitute good, old-fashioned field reporting. In a television industry increasingly glamourised and, I would say, dulled by the stifling sameness of studio chatter, my first love has remained being out there – chasing a new adventure. Whether it is reporting on the tsunami that swept India, or from Pakistan after Osama bin Laden was killed, or from Egypt and Libya during the Arab Spring, or from the villages of India during election campaigns, it is only out in the field that you can grow as a journalist.
But there’s one story Prabha Dutt got to report on that has left her daughter deeply envious. On my wall is a photograph of my mother squeezed between John Lennon and Paul McCartney, matter-of-factly chatting with them on their India tour. Now that is something for which I would trade a lot! Today, I only hope that I will do my mother proud. Getting the same award as she did means more to me than so many other recognitions.
Barkha Dutt is currently Group Editor at NDTV 24×7 and host of the weekly show, ‘We the People’. She won the Chameli Devi Jain Award in 1999, for her reporting on the Orissa cyclone and the Kargil War. Her mother, Prabha Dutt, won the award in 1982.

Prominent leaders all praise for Nizami

LAHORE - Noted political and journalistic figures of the country have extended their heartiest felicitations for the journalistic contributions of Nawa-i-Waqt Group Editor-in-Chief Majid Nizami at the historic juncture of golden jubilee celebrations on Friday.
They besides congratulating Majid Nizami on the completion of 50 years of his editorship, acknowledged the great work done under his dynamic leadership in these years, saying that the Nawa-i-Waqt Group stood out as an ideological beam of light in the gales of dictatorial regimes.
These views were expressed by Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani, Balochistan Governor and Chief Minister, Parliamentary Committee on Kashmir Chairman Maulana Fazl-ur-Rehman, Editor-in-Chief The Balochistan Times through their messages.
The PM in his message said that Nawa-i-Waqt Group has been leading the nation with vigour. He said that the Nawa-i-Waqt not only played a unique role in Pakistan Movement but also in the building of Pakistan as per the views of Quaid-i-Azam and Allama Iqbal. The criticism of this paper has always been constructive for the government and the opposition alike.
Nizami, he said, during the last half century developed new journalistic trends through his paper and could rightly be termed as an institution in it. Lauding Nizami’s role during the worst martial law regimes, Nizami uttered the right word without any fear. He also praised the role of Nawa-i-Waqt Group on Afghanistan, Palestine or Kashmir issue, during Tehreek-i-Namoos-i-Risalat, movement for the restoration of democracy and rehabilitation of the 2005 earthquake victims and 2010-11 flood victims in the country. The struggle against extremism and terrorism is not second to none, the Premier asserted.
Besides praying for his health, the P M said, “Majid Nizami is an asset for the nation as well as that of country who proved to be a beacon of light in the dark ages of dictatorial regimes the country faced one after the other.
Balochistan Governor Nawab Zulfiqar Ali Magsi in his message said that Majid Nizami had an international fame through his journalistic and social services. A great patriot, a Pakistan Movement Worker and proponent of positive, constructive and modern journalism in the country, his services for field of journalism are unmatchable. His life, he said, was a guiding star for the youth who could play a constructive role in the building process of the country.
Chief Minister Aslam Raisani in his note said, “Majid Nizami has continued the mission of Hameed Nizami who played an active role in Pakistan Movement ” He said that the positive and constructive criticism of Nawa-i-Waqt Group paved a way for democratic governments. He hoped that the mission would continue for the freedom of expression and people’s rights in the country.
Parliamentary Committee on Kashmir Chairman Maulana Fazl-ur-Rehman in his message said Nawa-i-Waqt had raised a voice for Islam, Pakistan and against the US imperialism that gave them a new spirit. The ideological journalism under the editorship of Majid Nizami, he stressed, made this group unique in the world of Press.
Balochistan Times Editor-in-Chief Syed Faseih Iqbal said that Nawa-i-Waqt Group had a role in promoting healthy journalism based on principles, values and ideology. “Allah has specially bestowed Nizami with the vision to do all these services for the nation,” Iqbal said. “I would also like to acknowledge Nizami’s instrumental role in creation and promotion of Nazaria-i-Pakistan Trust, Aiwan-e-Karkunan-e-Tehreek-i-Pakistan, Aiwan-e-Quaid-i-Azam, Pakistan Freedom Movement Gold Medal”, he stated in his note.

Duane Baughman's BHUTTO Wins Prestigious Peabody Award


Critically Acclaimed Film Recognized by Peabody Board for Excellence in Electronic Media in 2011


Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/04/06/4396263/duane-baughmans-bhutto-wins-prestigious.html#storylink=cpy

/PRNewswire/ -- Duane Baughman's feature length documentary film, BHUTTO, which aired on PBS's Independent Lens series, was among 38 recipients of the esteemed 71st Annual Peabody Award, announced yesterday by the University of Georgia's Grady College of Journalism and Mass Communication.  The Peabody honors outstanding achievements made in electronic media over the past year and is considered one of the most significant awards in media.    
"The range of the Peabody Awards' search for excellence has never been wider or deeper than this year," said Horace Newcomb, Director of the Peabody Awards.  Newcomb described BHUTTO as a documentary where "former Pakistani president Benazir Bhutto's life story unfolded like an epic novel, with a fairy tale beginning, a martyr's death and years of social awakening and political courage in between."
"It is an absolute honor to have been recognized with an award as widely respected as the Peabody is," said Baughman, director and producer of the multi-award winning film.  "Benazir Bhutto's story is an inspiring, heroic, and barrier-shattering for women across continents, religions, and ethnicities.  I am humbled to have been able to share her legacy with the West, the world and women everywhere."
Baughman, a national Democratic political consultant and president and creative director of The Baughman Company and founder of Yellow Pad Productions, has played a pivotal role in ground breaking victories for women leaders across America, including Hillary Clinton's 20 primary and caucus wins during her historic 2008 presidential bid.  Baughman has been instrumental in helping current HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius become the first woman re-elected Governor of Kansas and Shirley Franklin become the first African American woman Mayor of Atlanta.
His film has also earned both the ABCNews VideoSource Award from The International Documentary Association and an EPIC Award for its promotion of women's rights and leadership by The White House Project.  
To watch the full Winners Announcement for the Peabody Awards, please visit: http://www.peabody.uga.edu/71stwinners.php

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/04/06/4396263/duane-baughmans-bhutto-wins-prestigious.html#storylink=cpy

Pakistani Journalist Finds Hockey and Hope in Minnesota

Having grown up in one of the oldest cities on the Indian subcontinent, you might not expect English words to come so easily to Gharidah Farooqi.  But they do.  Especially when describing her experience at a recent Wild hockey game.
(PHOTO: Gharidah Farooqi is second from the left.  Also pictured left to right are 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS producers Tim Burns, Molly Andersen, and Amanda Theisen)
When talking about a last-minute Erik Christensen goal that tied the game, or about the Miko Koivu goal that won the game in overtime, Farooqi uses words like "amazing" and "really exciting."  
Strong words given what she's seen in her career as a journalist.
Her first field assignment was in 2005, covering an earthquake that killed 79,000 in Pakistan's Kashmir region.  More recently, she reported on the killing of Osama bin Laden by U.S. Navy SEALs .
Farooqi is spending time at 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS and KSTP.COM as part of the U.S./Pakistan Professional Partnership Program.  Created in 2009, the U.S. State Department describes it as part of a "U.S. strategy to bring peace and stability in the Afghanistan/Pakistan region." 
Farooqi is part of the fourth group of Pakistani journalists to visit the United States since the program began, and the second to visit 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS and KSTP.COM.  One group of American journalists has also traveled to Pakistan.  The goal, says the State Department, is "to develop cross cultural relationships and develop professional skills that will postively impact people's lives and will result in stronger ties between the two nations."
Farooqi hopes Minnesotans will ask her about her country, rather than rely on the images they see on TV.
"Pakistan is so much more than O.B.L. (Osama bin Laden)," said Farooqi.
She's also learning the United States is more than what she's seen on CNN and the Fox News Channel.
"Americans are great people to work with," she said, describing the people she's met during her time here as "friendly" and "professional."  After a week here, she found many similarities with the newsrooms where she's worked.  But, she did find one difference that really struck a chord with her.
"I see a lot of women working in the newsroom," she said.  "We don't have that in my country."
Farooqi said very few women had reported major stories in Pakistan when she was sent to cover the 2005 earthquake.  At the time, she was working for Pakistan TV, a state-run organization she says held a virtual monopoly on the news business up until a decade ago. 
She says the rise of private television stations, first broadcasting from outside of Pakistan, and now from within, is slowly changing the landscape for women in journalism.  She sees it happening at Geo News, where she now works as an anchor and reporter.
But looking at the diversity of the staff in the 5 EYEWITNESS NEWS and KSTP.COM newsroom, led by News Director Lindsay Radford, she sees more room for improvement back home.
"We need to learn this in my country," she said.
Farooqi's work on Geo News is broadcast all over Pakistan.  It can also be seen via cable and satellite in the United Arab Emirates, parts of Europe, Canada, and here in the United States.
And, if you wondered why English words come so easily to her, (as I did), credit her early schooling.  In her hometown of Multan, she attended a mission school where she was taught by British nuns.

Pakistani journalists meet with Rock Bridge High School journalists


COLUMBIA — The brightly lit halls of Rock Bridge High School are a long way away from Azam Khan’s home in Charsadda, Pakistan.
Khan is from a tribal region along the Afghan-Pakistan border where the electricity comes and goes, and residents get to enjoy about two to three hours of it each day.
To hear more

Two of the journalists from Pakistan will be featured on the Global Journalist Radio program, at globaljournalist.org at 9 a.m. Thursday.
The program will also air on Thursday at 6:30 p.m. on KBIA 91.3 FM.



On March 21 Khan arrived in Honolulu with nine other journalists from various parts of Pakistan, in order to learn more about media and life in the U.S. Columbia was chosen as a stop on the journalist’s U.S. tour, so they could visit the Missouri School of Journalism. Rock Bridge was chosen as a stop in Columbia, because of the school’s strong journalism program.
On Tuesday, two Rock Bridge students gave the journalists a tour of the high school.
The tour wound through art classes, the Performing Arts Center and into the cafeteria where Khan was surprised that students could buy 50-cent bowls of cereal. In the tribal areas around Charsadda, consistent and adequate access to nutrition, medicine and especially education are major issues. He said he thought it was good that students could  purchase affordable food at school here.
Khan takes great pride in reporting about issues of accessibility to basic resources.  Though electricity is unreliable in Charsadda, Khan files about thirty stories a week for Radio Pakistan - Peshawar, using his Internet cell phone.
Radio is the most essential media in his area because limited access to electricity and low literacy rates mean televisions and newspapers are underutilized.
“In the tribal areas, there aren’t enough schools, the nearest hospitals are far away, illiteracy is high and only 10 percent of girls are going to school," Khan said on the walk to Robin Stover’s journalism class.
Khan has three kids, who he will teach at home until they are old enough to walk the several kilometers to school everyday. Khan believes education is at the heart of the issues facing rural and tribal Pakistan, and that educating the children of these areas would go a long way to combat militant attacks in the area.
“Education will uplift Pakistan,” Khan said.
In Stover’s classroom, students were working on content for the school's three publications. Students in the class publish a weekly newspaper called The Rock, an online edition called the Bearing News and a quarterly magazine called the Southpaw.
The Pakistani journalists pulled out their iPhones to text friends and co-workers pictures and video of the classroom. The students and journalists discussed the use of social media and shared ideas about Facebook and Twitter. The use of social media is a significant part of cultural transmission between the two countires. 
Many of the Pakistani journalists come from big cities like the capital Islamabad and Karachi, a city that has a population almost twice that of Missouri's population. Many aspects of American culture, businesses and films are popular in these places, but most of the journalists on the tour have never been outside of Pakistan before.
Like social media, the goal of the organization sponsoring this trip, the East-West Center, is to foster understanding and amicable relations between Asian countries and the United States. The Honolulu-based organization was established by Congress in 1960 to promote research, dialogue and understanding between Asia and the U.S.
The exchange of Gmail accounts and cell phone numbers between the student and professional journalists in Stover’s classroom seemed to confirm the achievement of these goals.
As the journalists prepared to depart the school, some of them mentioned wanting to come back and study in Columbia some day, maybe on a Fulbright Scholarship.
Khan seemed excited to return to Charsadda with the perspective he’d attained on his tour thus far. He reiterated that change in his region would happen only through education and awareness.

WHO to hold health journalism awards ceremony


The World Health Organisation (WHO) has announced to hold the Health Journalism Awards for Polio Eradication in May. It has stated that thousands of articles, reports and analyses by the media made polio eradication the most highlighted health and social sector issue of the country since the last one year, says a press release.

A special delegation of the World Health Organisation, headed by Country Representative Dr. Guido Sabatinelli, shared this with ‘The News’ Resident Editor Mohammad Malick during a meeting here on Wednesday. Polio Communications and Partnerships Focal Person Alfred Dube was also present in the meeting.

The WHO country representative, while giving details of the health awards, shared with Mohammad Malick that more than 200 health beat correspondents from throughout the country will be invited to take part in the awards, whereas entries from the 7th April 2011 to 7 April 2012 will be considered eligible for the awards.

“We have chosen ‘End Polio Now’ as the official theme of the health awards for the only reason that polio eradication has remained the focus of health-related coverage in the Pakistani media,” said Dr. Guido.

Dr. Guido said that Pakistan was one of the three polio endemic countries in the world, whereas the country had reported 15 polio cases till date during the current year. “Last year, during the corresponding period, Pakistan had reported 22 polio cases, which shows that this year, we are progressing well in the fight against the poliovirus,” he said.

According to him, the World Health Organisation had concerns regarding the population movement of the IDPs (Internally Displaced Persons) from Khyber Agency to Jalozai Camp. “We fear a polio outbreak due to massive population movements from Khyber Agency to the Jalozai IDP Camp,” he said while sharing that WHO and the KP government had launched an emergency polio campaign in Jalozai camp and routes leading outside of the Khyber Agency including Bara Tehsil.

It was highlighted that more than 100,000 kids have remained inaccessible to polio teams since 2009 only in Khyber Agency and there was sufficient technical evidence with WHO that active circulation of the crippling poliovirus in the area was a growing challenge for the polio-eradication authorities. “Only Bara in Khyber Agency has reported 5 polio cases during the current year,” said Alfred Dube.

The WHO country representative paid tribute to efforts of ‘The News’ and ‘Jang’ in keeping the public updated about health issues, including polio and dengue fever. “We look forward to ‘Jang’ and ‘The News’ for their support in keeping the people of Pakistan updated about their health,” he remarked.

Thursday, 5 April 2012

Curtains on Dateline Islamabad

ISLAMABAD: Just over 14 months after its launch, Islamabad Dateline, the so-called ‘Capital’s daily’ was abruptly shut down Tuesday (April 3).
The disappointing news was broken to staff members Tuesday evening by the management that had been struggling to keep the ship afloat for the past few months.
Publisher Mustansar Javed, who was in Dubai for the past one week, reportedly to persuade investors to continue funding the paper, returned empty-handed.
The first signs that all was not well with the newspaper that was launched in January 2011 came in February when four of its pages were dropped – down to 12 from the original 16.  An attempt was made to compensate the thinness with a new layout but it proved to a damp squib.
Also quite a few staff members were shown the door indicating that the paper was sinking fast.
The newspaper never actually was able to find its feet despite tall claims that it was out to “own Islamabad” and “connect with the citizens over and above considerations for a sales pitch.”
Dateline Islamabad edited by Kamran Rehmat had about 50 staffers, who have been promised two-month salaries as compensation for the sudden closure.

Friends and foes of Syria


In the Friends of Syria meeting attended by hundreds of people from various political camps, a young man started crying hysterically. Many searching eyes could only see a group of men consoling someone as proceedings continued.
“Are these tears of joy over the impressive gathering here or an expression of perpetual pain we have been withstanding over the years,” I asked myself while creeping forwards towards the man in his early 30s.
I did not dare ask him the reason behind his tears. Instead I asked a friend to inquire from him. The man looked down and said with soaked eyes: “The army killed my childhood friend in Idlib today.” I was speechless, devoid of words to comfort him. Recent scenes before I quietly left Syria to Turkey via Lebanon moved like a documentary in front of my eyes. I have myself seen slaughtered youth in the streets of Damascus. I could relate to him.
I could only tell my friend Omar that crying had become a big part of the daily routine for Syrians, sometimes it was for a friend or a lover and often for our country.
Suddenly Omar looked at me with angry eyes and said, “I regret the March 15 protests.” I could not believe that an educated, well-travelled man would torpedo the entire struggle in such a way. Detecting my questioning yet silent reaction, he continued, “Look how many people have died and how many more will.”
After he left, I wondered if all scarifies are worth the goals? Then, I looked around and noticed optimistic members of the Syrian opposition, sharing the table with the Turkish foreign minister Ahmet Devotuglu, and his American and British counterparts, Hillary Clinton and William Hague, respectively.
Besides the winning assurance of the world community to help the Syrians, they were discussing the transition of the country from absolute dictatorship to democracy. The presences of these high profile dignitaries’ from as many as 83 nations was a huge vote of confidence for our struggle.
The conference was studded with many top journalists from around the world who shared their heroic stories of defying Syrian military to enter and report from besieged towns. They had unbelievable eye witness accounts of the suffering people who didn’t shy away from being hospitable with whatever they have. Some journalists started to speak about solutions to the impasse. Here, the mighty names of the journalism world exposed themselves, reflecting on as to how little they knew about the realities of Syria.
One journalist told me, “The problem is that the Syrian intellectuals or ‘muthakafin’ are not part of the awakening yet.” As shocked as I was, I couldn’t help being amused by his feeble understanding of the regime’s tactics. I told him, “When you say intellectuals in Syria, who are you to referring to? The Assads never allow any cultural or political activity that clashes with the Baathist mindset  … Thus many have migrated either to resist or to lead a better life.”
After a long wait, I got weary of the closed proceedings. The suspense was enormous as the conference convened amid the unusual hype of concrete steps. I approached a senior Syrian citizen for more than what the spokesman would share with the media.
The seasoned activist was certain that the time for action against the regime has come. He was excited telling me that Turkey is planning to create buffer zones in many cities of Syria where its people could peacefully live and protest against the regime. Soon a noisy reporter interrupted our conversation. She did not like two Syrians talking discreetly sharing inside information. Though obnoxiously, she did try to get some news but we only paused to let her pass.
The man sounded certain that sisterly countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar would provide the Free Syria Army with weapons. She intervened again, “Don’t repeat our mistake. Like Lebanon, these free floating arms will take Syria to an unknown frontier. We, the Lebanese, are still fighting with each other. She might have honestly expressed her fears but this doesn’t seem true of the Syrians anymore. The people have reached a point of no return against the Assads who have controlled minds, plundered wealth and silenced defiant voices for over four decades.
An impish Tunisian reporter jumped in our conversation, asking the Syrian activist directly as to when he would get his Kalashnikov. Another not-so-naïve journalist, who could sneak inside Syria to report, wanted a clear-cut reply over weaponisation of the opposition. “Have they agreed to provide you arms?” The Syrian opposition figure calmly replied, “Do you think that they will announce it publicly? We think they will provide us the money and we will buy the arms.” Failing to get definite news, she left us saying, “Its b*&^#@!%.”
Though I know overwhelming pro-democracy activists now support armed struggle against the military, I asked the Syrian figure if he was afraid of the dangers the strategy posed. He whispered, “I am terrified at the idea of arming youth.”
Once again, I realised how much the Syrians want to keep the struggle peaceful. But Bashar convinces us that we don’t have many choices.
For many journalists attending the Friends of Syria meeting, dramatic news makes their day but for Syrians, life and death depends on how their movement is steered, as well as portrayed. The mood in the press gallery was cold-blooded and competitive and not at all sensitive and humanitarian.
While hoping that Assad would accept Annan’s peace plan, the opposition agreed to even sit with the regime to save the country from a prolonged civil war. Ironically, such a wise decision did not make the banner headlines journalist could have taken pride in.
As the conference ended and the media rushed to interview Syria’s exiled opposition members, a surge of disapproval rose in me. These defiant men and women live a safe and happy life in Europe, America and elsewhere with no fear of bullets and Bashar’s spies. I looked into their sleep-starved eyes and wrinkled foreheads, they appeared restless; but not indolent. A Syrian opposition members is best described as ‘homeless’. Most of them are not economic migrants, merely ashamed of living quietly in Syria. Those who knew my Syrian identity came to say good bye. Some hugged me, promising to meet again in Homs, others said “see you in Idlib” and some only prayed for peace and dignity.
Everyone mentioned returning to or visiting their own city but the question of ‘when’ remains unanswered for now.
Maryam Hasan is a young journalist, whose family struggled against Hafiz Al-Assad’s tyrannical rule and policies. She is using a pen-name due to security reasons.

The search for 'truthiness' in today's media world

If we made a video about today's media world, we could title it Truthiness, MMXII - and watch it go viral.
On Thursday, the advocacy group Invisible Children Inc. was scheduled to post online the sequel to the spectacular and notorious viral video Kony 2012, about Ugandan strongman Joseph Kony. Kony 2012 started a wildfire controversy over Invisible Children and whether it's telling the truth or rather sensationalizing to attract supporters. Will Kony 2012 Part II throw gunpowder on the fire?
It's just the most recent in a flood of stories in which the central character - battered, elusive, debated, denied - is named Truth. Or, to echo Stephen Colbert, Truthiness.
"In the present media atmosphere," says Anthony R. DePalma, writer-in-residence at Seton Hall University (and former New York Times correspondent), "you're being bombarded. It's too much, all the time. So when people present neat, simplistic stories, you reach out for them. And if they confirm what you already believe, you reach out even more."
"There's a lot of confusion in the media marketplace," says Mark W. Tatge, professor of journalism at DePauw University (and former longtime journalist). "I'm horrified by a lot of what I'm seeing. Truth claims routinely get mixed up with opinion or entertainment."
In the last month, the confused consumer has had to contend with a lot.
On March 1, the blogger Andrew Breitbart died, renewing debate over his techniques. They tested - some say destroyed - the distinction between truth and falsehood. They had impact, though, prompting the July 2010 resignation of U.S. Department of Agriculture officer Shirley Sherrod and the June 2011 step-down of U.S. Rep. Anthony Weiner (D., N.Y.) after Breitbart made public sexually explicit texts and images Weiner sent.
This January, the popular Public Radio International show This American Life ran performance artist Mike Daisey's story, alleging abuses at electronics manufacturer Foxconn in China. It turned out he fabricated much of his presentation. On March 16, the show retracted his work, apologized, and devoted a full hour to discussing its error. Other sources cite troubles at the Foxconn factories - but Daisey never saw much of what he said he'd seen.
Consider, too, the media war over the shooting of Sanford, Fla., teenager Trayvon Martin, allegedly by neighborhood watch captain George Zimmerman. It has flared into an angry debate over racism, vigilantism, and self-defense laws. It's also led to celebrity howlers. A Twitter post at @RealWillSmith purported to share Zimmerman's address. The director Spike Lee, with more than 250,000 Twitter followers, passed it along. It turned out to be the address of an unsuspecting couple, the McClains, who fled to a hotel to avoid the resulting spasm of attention. Lee has apologized and reached a settlement with the McClains.
Truth stretched, spun, misrepresented, pretzeled.
Kony 2012 is the biggest viral video ever, with 86.8 million hits on YouTube as of Wednesday afternoon. It takes aim at the alleged depredations of Kony, wanted for human-rights abuses and terror killings. The issue is less whether Kony is a bad man than whether Invisible Children overdramatizes and stylizes just how bad he is, to stoke a movement to bring him to justice. Critics say Kony 2012 takes advantage of naive younger viewers to spur outrage and action.
"I watched it," said Christopher Harper, codirector of the Multimedia Urban Reporting Lab at Temple University. "It just seemed the story they were telling was too bad." He doesn't mind the advocacy: "But with such productions, what I need and don't get is a way to check the facts, to drill down to the authentic truth."
The debacle at This American Life was, in Harper's words, "A failure at the institutional level, much as with CBS News and Rathergate," in which CBS anchor Dan Rather based a 60 Minutes report about President George W. Bush on documents that turned out to be bogus.
As for Martin, DePalma says, "I'm using to teach my students how to approach news in which all sides take extreme positions." Harper says, "That's a case where everybody needs to take two steps back and let the investigation determine the truth."
Kony may well be evil. Foxconn has issues. It's wrong for a man, in public trust or not, to "sext" unsuspecting women. And the killing of an unarmed teen stirs understandable emotions. But does being on "the right side" get you off the hook for sideswiping the truth?
Invisible Children, Breitbart, and Daisey have their defenders. Blogger David Wain cites the " '100 percent true, except for the parts that aren't' " memoir tradition, which he calls "well established." John Cook, writing for the website Gawker, says you can't lie in the service of a "larger truth." He blasts this "Sedaris exception," named after the funnyman and memoirist David Sedaris, known to have fun with facts.
How did we get here? "The old media silos have broken down," says Tatge. "We used to have a few papers and a few networks, and they were our sources for news. Now there are hundreds of sources. And the economic/distribution model of news has also broken down. Some call that a good thing. The problem is there's no control over what has replaced it."
Another problem: "Anyone can set up a blog," says Tatge. "It's quick, it's easy. But not everyone is a journalist." DePalma says the ease and speed of posting and sharing "makes people willing to accept what they see on their favorite sites."
A third problem: "Media illiteracy," says Harper. All of the sources for this story are teaching students where news comes from and how to think critically. "People are lazy," says Harper, "when they need to be their own media filters."
DePalma teaches his students "the Four Ds" of critical thinking: Doubt (question the truth of too-simple, too-pat, or one-source stories), Detect (seek out sources that confirm or disagree), Discern (assess the background, standing, and stake sources have in what they publish), and Demand (stand up for your right to get the truth).
In the Gospel of John, an anxious Pilate says to Jesus, "What is truth?" Good question. In an increasingly busy, complicated media world, the first step to answering it may well be to ask it.(By John Timpane)

http://www.philly.com/philly/entertainment/146271905.html