Sabir Shah ,Thursday, November 13, 2014
LAHORE: Journalists and media houses all over the world have often been punished by their respective courts and media regulators for committing culpable crimes such as false reporting, defamation, libel, slander, extortion, getting their palms greased and even for not contemptuously disclosing sources of their stories before the presiding judges, a cumbersome research conducted by the Jang Group/Geo Television reveals.
Starting with India, here follow some widely-publicized global precedents in this context:
1. Not so long ago in November 2012, two senior journalists working an esteemed Indian television channel “Zee News” were arrested on extortion charges.
(Reference: the BBC online edition of November 27, 2012)
Sudhir Chaudhary, head of news, and Samir Ahluwalia, head of business at the “Zee News,” were jailed after they were accused of trying to extort $18 million from an Indian business firm “Jindal Group” in exchange for suppressing reports about the company’s alleged links to a high-profile corruption scandal involving the allocation of coal mining concessions.
LAHORE: Journalists and media houses all over the world have often been punished by their respective courts and media regulators for committing culpable crimes such as false reporting, defamation, libel, slander, extortion, getting their palms greased and even for not contemptuously disclosing sources of their stories before the presiding judges, a cumbersome research conducted by the Jang Group/Geo Television reveals.
Starting with India, here follow some widely-publicized global precedents in this context:
1. Not so long ago in November 2012, two senior journalists working an esteemed Indian television channel “Zee News” were arrested on extortion charges.
(Reference: the BBC online edition of November 27, 2012)
Sudhir Chaudhary, head of news, and Samir Ahluwalia, head of business at the “Zee News,” were jailed after they were accused of trying to extort $18 million from an Indian business firm “Jindal Group” in exchange for suppressing reports about the company’s alleged links to a high-profile corruption scandal involving the allocation of coal mining concessions.